Supreme Court dismisses Neri's petition against Lam-an Housing Project
The Supreme Court has dismissed the
Petition for Certiorari with Prayer for the Issuance of a Temporary Restraining
Order filed by the petitioners against the Lam-am Housing project.
The petitioners, including individuals
such as Liezl M. Torres, Conchita A. Danaoto, Joselita C. Amplayo, Jaime M.
Dagodog, Angelita R. Dagodog, Elena P. Matutes, Virgilio R. Carpio, Constancia
C. Unclara, Raul A. Denore, Tessie C. Denore, Catherine Janice E. Neri, Camilo
E. Neri, Jr., Melina N. Soliano, Pinky B. De Guia, and Irenea E. Tadle brought
the petition against Hon. Presiding Judge Soliver C. Peras, Regional Trial
Court of Ozamiz City, Branch 15 and Branch 35, and the City of Ozamiz,
represented by [then] Mayor Sancho Fernando F. Oaminal. They alleged Grave
Abuse of Discretion Amounting to Lack or Excess of Jurisdiction.
In a 7-page resolution dated November 22,
2023, the Supreme Court stated that it found no reason to deviate from the
conclusion of the RTC.
The Court acknowledged that the City of
Ozamiz had presented evidence indicating that the project in question involved
the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), with the city merely tasked
to provide the land for its implementation.
The Court further noted that the City of
Ozamiz had been authorized by the Sangguniang Panlungsod to expropriate the
petitioners' land, and a valid offer had been made, which was declined by the
petitioners.
Additionally, the issuance of writs of
possession was granted after the deposit of 100% of the land's value based on
the current relevant zonal valuation, in accordance with the provisions of R.A.
10752.
Regarding the allegation of Grave Abuse of
Description, the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the RTC had
"exercised judgment capriciously, whimsically, arbitrarily, or
despotically" out of passion and hostility when issuing the contested Orders
dated March 3, 2020, and March 23, 2020.
Upon denying the Petition for Certiorari,
the Supreme Court also rejected the petitioners' prayer for the issuance of a
temporary restraining order and/or writ of preliminary injunction.
Comments
Post a Comment